RODS v.s. Insects

Although this is a valid arguement Jose Escamilla pointed out these facts in 1994. He wanted to make sure early on that he was indeed "not mis-filming" insects or birds.

DEBUNKERS WEB SITES:

Debunkers have built complete web sites in an attempt to discredit Jose Escamilla and the Rods phenomenon by claiming they are nothing more than "insects" causing a camera artifact on the CCD's of camcorders.

The debunkers have gone as far as claiming they are presenting their evidence using the high shutter settings, but they are mis-leading you.

 

 

 
 

Research

1). When you shoot video of insects, birds or anything such as a baseball that has just been pitched using the "Auto or Normal" settings of any camcorder, you will get a blurred "elongated" version of the object on video. A not so true representation of what you have videotaped.

2) The "Skyfishing Protocol' that Jose Escamilla created allows you to eliminate any artifacts caused by "low shutter" settings or motion blur. Using the camcorder manual settings and putting the shutter setting at it's highest, allows you record anything traveling fast, close to the lens, a small or far distance away without motion blur. Instead you can clearly distinguish insects, birds and everything else for what they really are.

NETWORK TELEVISION DEBUNKERS:

Television programs where Jose Escamilla appeared presenting his evidence have never presented ALL the evidence. "PROOF POSITIVE" is a perfect example of a network program deliberately made to deceive it's viewing audiences.

Proof Positive is alledgedly a program that "scientifically" investigated paranormal phenomena. Instead of presenting all the evidence on Rods, they presented only what would fit in their debunking program.

The best way to debunk anything is to "not present" all the facts and to make your claims by presenting "only" what you want your audiences to see.